Is Group Brainstorming BS?

Posted On February 1, 2012

People in groups tend to sit back and let others do the work; they instinctively mimic others’ opinions and lose sight of their own; and, often succumb to peer pressure. The Emory University neuroscientist Gregory Berns found that when we take a stance different from the group’s, we activate the amygdala, a small organ in the brain associated with the fear of rejection. Professor Berns calls this “the pain of independence.

via The Brainstorming Process Is B.S. But Can We Rework It? | Co.Design: business + innovation + design.

Really interesting article on Co.Design that basically says the IDEO / BBDO way of unfiltered group brainstorming is ineffective. The three points: we’re more creative working alone, criticism improves the brainstorming process, and creativity is about happenstance, not planning.

I wholeheartedly agree with points 1 and 3, but have reservations about 2, criticism. The argument is that ideas usually come from the need to find a solution to a problem. Criticizing refines and redefines those problems, which gives the mind more to work with.

I’d agree with that, as long as there’s a constant flow of news ideas running. Some criticism isn’t bad. What is bad is when one person shuts down everyone else’s idea because they’re trying to cram their own idea down everyone’s throat. Or worse, they don’t have any of their own ideas.

I’d love to hear a reaction to this from IDEO.

Written by Joey Daoud

Joey Daoud is an award-winning documentary producer. When not filming he likes to climb mountains and brew coffee.

Related Posts

WSJ Looks at Indie Film Investing

An article over the weekend from WSJ talks about investing in independent films. Interesting to look at this through the prism of someone with decent wealth who is looking for some high risk investments to diversify their portfolio. Here's how they paint the ideal...

How to Figure the True Cost of a Kickstarter Project

Focus of Project The first big question is do I got for all the money I actually need (to film, edit, and send to festivals) or focus the project on one specific event, and take it one step at a time, with future projects for different stages of the production. … Well, if you were 100% honest and your project budget is the bare minimum you need to complete it, then where is that couple of hundred dollars supposed to come from?

Behavior Patterns of Kickstarter Funders

This is a precursor to a post I'm writing on how to figure out the true cost of a Kickstarter Project (using my recently posted project as an experiment). I was curious to see what funding levels got the most response, so I'd know which area to put the most attention...

2 Comments

  1. Kurt

    While I think open-minded, and sort of free flow ideas to help improve something can be a good thing. I think it can be a dangerous thing if those creating the ideas fail to recognize the individual with the stronger idea, and merely following inline with a set rule that it has to be a piece of everyones idea. The practical and efficient should always prevail. Whether it takes a group to create it, or the lone person, the important thing is that it prevails.

    How does that saying go?

    “The horse was designed by an artist, and the Camel was designed by a committee.”

    As far as criticism being a catalyst to increasing potential, I think that’s simply bullshit. Drive comes from passion, you have to reinvent yourself, by yourself.

    • Joey

      I agree. I think of brainstorming more as a way to get everything out on the table (or board) as possible solutions, and then whittle them down. But in no way should your solution be obligated to incorporate an idea from everyone, that’s just death by committee. Or a camel.